This is likely to be very dangerous territory, as how one looks at current events inevitably exposes all manner of beliefs and biases. In the past I did not read so much about current events, other than in newspapers and magazines. But the 21st century has had such an extraordinary beginning that I have inevitably added books about it to my piles of things to read. I’ll comment here on what I find interesting, and why.
Jonathan Allen & Amie Parnes. Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign. New York: Crown, 2017.
This is an early, but likely far from the last, attempt at trying to explain what happened in the 2016 election. The authors of this volume covered Hillary Clinton’s campaign throughout the primaries and the ensuing general election. They describe in great detail what they perceived to be the many dysfunctional problems with the Clinton campaign organization — the disagreements among key figures, the incomplete communication and awareness, and the difficulties of combating Bernie Sanders in the primaries and Donald Trump in the general election. Both turned out to be formidable opponents, and the Clinton campaign never figured out how to reach the sectors of the population that both Sanders and Trump appealed to. Ironically, these were sectors that Clinton played to very effectively in her attempt earlier to run against Barrack Obama in 2008. Both Sanders and Trump had simple messages, while Hillary’s was much more complex, sophisticated, and nuanced, but difficult to convey to voters. And of course, many voters had great distrust of Hillary based on her past actions. And of course the campaign was plagued by the ongoing suspicions about her use of a private e-mail server while she was Secretary of State, including the very negative behavior of FBI Director Comey, the emerging Russian influence on the campaign, and her health issues that played into the accusation that she did not have the stamina to be President. While she clearly won all three of the televised debates with Trump, this was not sufficient to overcome the many problems that, as the authors claimed, doomed her campaign. This is an especially negative account of the 2016 election, and we’ll see how it plays out as more analyses are published. But it is a detailed accounting of many things that went wrong.
Dolly Chugh. The Person You Mean to Be: How Good People Fight Bias. New York: Harper, 2018.
This superbly insightful book was called to our attention by our daughter, Meredith. It deals with a very close-to-the-heart issue for me, namely, how a person with good intentions can actually work toward becoming a better person. The book draws heavily on relevant behavioral science research, yet illustrates the points made in that research by apt stories that make the points much more vividly. Then these insights are translated into suggested actions, many of them based on Chugh’s own experiences. While bias has its individual elements, in what we feel and how we act, there is also the biases built into our social systems. Failing to be aware of the latter is itself a serious matter, and can lead us to all manner of inappropriate behavior. Chugh talks about the headwinds and tailwinds that we experience because of these socially embedded biases, and its easy to be oblivious to the headwinds that others face. But the strength of the book is the practical steps that she suggests for dealing with concrete situations. It’s an altogether mind opening read.
Ta-Nehisi Coates. Between the World and Me. New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2015.
Ta-Nehisi Coates has written a stunning letter to his adolescent son about what it’s like to be a black man in the US. It’s a remarkable encapsulation of the history of race in America, and all of its current troubling implications. He develops this narrative through his experiences at Howard University, Civil War battlefields, the South side of Chicago, and Paris. At the center is Coates’ awareness of the threats against his body, in a society where police frequently kill unarmed black men and never suffer any consequences of it. Indeed, a friend of his from Howard University meets exactly this fate. In a moving section he visits the mother of his murdered friend. She is a highly successful physician, living in a suburban gated community, yet she too lives in a world that is shaped in many ways by the color of her skin. And like Coates, she also understands the threats against the bodies of young black men in America. It’s all-in-all a moving account of the greatest tragedy of American history, and the resulting situation in the present. I cannot help but agree with Toni Morrison’s comment on the cover, “This is required reading.”
James Fallows & Deborah Fallows. Our Towns: A 100,000-Mle Journey Into the Heart of America. New York: Vintage, 2019.
James Fallows, a pilot and author, and his wife and collaborator Deborah Fallows, took a four=year tour of medium- and small-sized cities all across America in their single-engine airplane. Their goal was to take the pulse of the nation by visiting places less well known. Many of the places have been through terrible times, economic disruption, factory closings, opioid epidemics, and a host of other modern maladies. Yet over and over they find hopeful signs. Downtowns being refreshed and energized. Citizens embarking on cultural and social reforms, creating new institutions, giving citizens hope and encouragement. They meet a broad range of people, citizens who care and act on their feelings. It is a hopeful narrative. There are of course troubles and setbacks, but on the whole people are striving to make things better. It’s a set of stories that run counter to many bleak narratives about what’s happening in our country.
Christopher Leonard. Kochland: The Secret History of Koch Industries and Corporate Power in America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2019.
This is, fundamentally, a frightening book. It shows how a determined and highly intelligent entrepreneur can amass a gigantic fortune while keeping the details of their activities relatively secret. Koch Industries, lead by the Koch family, but primarily Charles Koch, have over time amassed a sprawling corporate entity that in many ways touches almost every corner of our lives. They have done it through strategies developed by Charles Koch and implemented by highly talented people devoted to the mission of amassing enormous wealth. By remaining a private, family-owned company, they are not beholden to shareholders or the legal requirements of such publicly owned enterprises. In the process they have garnered enormous political power, all used to help them meet their goals. They opposed regulations, and in their history have repeatedly been in trouble for violating many of them. Their political machine has been assembled with the same intelligence and organizational savvy that had made Koch Industries so successful. Though Charles Koch is no fan of Donald Trump, he likes what the Trump administration has been doing to end environmental and other regulations that have put limits on what Koch can do. What makes the book frightening is that it shows what dedicated, highly intelligent people can do within the American system. And of course the wealth so accrued is the currency of great power within our political and social system. It’s a really incredible story, told in great detail in this fascinating business history.
Lawrence Lessig. Republic Lost: The Corruption of Equality and the Steps to End It. Rev. Ed. New York: Twelve, 2015.
This is an extremely important book. Everyone should read it, no matter your political stripe. It’s about how we have lost our government to the rich, and how this is opposed to the intentions of our founders, who wanted the government to represent the people, all people. That’s what Lessig means by the corruption of equality. It’s not that individuals in our government are corrupt, at least most of them. It’s that the system by which we select those who will govern has been corrupted by the role that money plays in even being qualified to run for office. Lessig traces the origins of this, the details of how it works, and why it is corrupting in the sense of denying the equality of representation that the founders intended. The details are striking and the arguments that Lessig lays out about the origins and effects are convincing. As he is at great pains to point out, this is neither a Democrat or Republican failing, it is a failing of the system that has evolved, and it works to the disadvantage of both parties. One outcome is the vetocracy that we currently endure, a Congress that can no longer get much of anything done. In the later chapters he lays out his ideas of what we can do about it, stressing all along the urgency of actually doing something. As he points out, the real victims of this situation are our children, who will inherit the results of the mess we have created. But he argues that even we older, well-taken-care-of citizens need to help to energize the young to act. He is optimistic. I wonder what he’s thinking today in the era of Trump.
While the present age is definitely not the first time that “fake news” has circulated, as the authors point out with an amusing initial story about the vegetable lamb, it has gained considerable prominence in our current era of undisciplined social media and other sketchy information sources. It certainly plagued the 2016 election and the subsequent Trump administration. But as the authors show, there is a long history of such matters, and they develop some interesting conceptual tools for understanding how it can happen. Their first three chapters focus mostly on examples from science, including the ozone hole that led to the banishment of fluorocarbons, the linking of tobacco to lung cancer, and global warming. In all of these cases, there were active campaigns to denigrate the mostly sound scientific findings. These various stories are described in detail, and their conceptual schemas brought to bear in trying to understand them. The fourth and final chapter focuses on the “fake news” phenomena of the very recent past, again using their conceptual tools to try to make sense of how these things can happen. Overall, it’s a compelling analysis, and they make an effort to make it widely understandable, even if their style is closer to academic than mainstream media. But it’s well worth the read.
Daniel Susskind. A World Without Work: Technology, Automation, and How We Should Respond. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2020.
The premise of this book is that the contemporary “pragmatist” revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) will ultimately replace humans for many kinds of work. As Susskind describes it, the first wave of AI tried to build intelligent systems by using rules extracted from humans who do a particular kind of task. While it had some level of success, it never got as far as the visions about what could be accomplished. But the second, current wave, which he dubs “pragmatist”, is based on massively parallel machine intelligence systems that figure out on their own how to do whatever task. This has led to such systems as Deep Blue, which was able to defeat chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov, or AlphaGo, that beat the best Go player, Lee Sedol. Even more impressive was AlphaGo Zero, which unlike Deep Blue or AlphaGo, had no human extracted knowledge. It was simply given the rules of Go, and on its own played millions of games and figured out how to win entirely on its own, and then thrashed the original AlphaGo. But these game playing examples are merely the tip of the iceberg. These “pragmatic” strategies have been used to build programs that do some kinds of medical diagnosis as well as or better than expert humans, and many other examples reviewed by Susskind. The promise is that this kind of machinery could be applied to any reasonably well-defined human task, and over time, could replace many kinds of work that humans currently do. As he says, it won’t happen suddenly, but rather eventually. Given that work is how most of us support ourselves, what will happen when there is not enough work for all? He reviews many options and issues. It’s a sobering prospect, but one that is important to think about now. Some of the political or social issues surrounding his solutions will be major obstacles, but by reviewing them now we have the chance to make some progress. He also considers the matter that for many their work provides a kind of meaning to their lives that will have to be provided by other means. It’s a thoughtful discussion that all of us should engage.
David Wallace-Wells. The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming. New York: Tim Duggan Books, 2019.
This is about as grim a book as you could imagine about the prospects for the earth. It reviews across twelve amazing chapters all the kinds of things that will happen if we fail to take action to defuse the steady increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The paradox is that it’s been the fossil fuels of coal and oil that have driven the enormous economic expansion brought about by industrialization and capitalism. But the wealth that has been created comes at a huge cost, and in the coming decades, the bill will come due. Wallace-Wells reviews the evidence in sober detail. As he points out, climate scientists have not found glee in what they have uncovered through their extensive analyses. Yet in the US in particular, climate deniers and greedy fossil fuel barons have held back even a shred of progress toward mitigating the incredible range of future disasters. And the clock is ticking, and it’s not long before nothing can be done. The ultimate sadness is those of us in the wealthy West fail to think about those who will be most impacted by all of this: our future descendants, and the poor of the world. The developing world will pay the highest price for our carbon-based wealth. In later chapters he reviews how at least some people are reacting. The mega wealthy are looking into escape. The spiritual are looking at painful acceptance. And the Silicon Valley idealists are looking for some kind of techno miracle. But as he points out, all the elements of a solution are known and here. All that is lacking is the political will to do what’s necessary. And he is not optimistic about how the politics will play out.